Centuries before Socrates lived, there were Greek thinkers in Ionia who made a remarkable discovery. They recognized the difference between things considered supernatural, and the observable world of nature.

Their ideas about nature and nature's laws led to the development of natural philosophy. Thinking about what is outside nature was left aside, to develop into theology. Natural philosophy meanwhile became natural science. In our time it is simply "science."

In the scientific way of thinking, the language used is about what exists or may exist in nature. Modern humanism is built within nature, using the language of nature. Thus, right and wrong are known by human experience, in this world, with no reference to any supernatural authority.

Theologians, not scientists, discuss supernatural interests. Theological language includes "revelation," "theism," "atheism," "agnosticism," "predestination," "Satan," "God,"

Lenin's "historical determinism," Hubbard's "engrains," Reich's "orgones" and Freud's "drives." Humanism stands on its own--no need to use language of supernaturalism.

Asked if he believes in the existence of God, no Humanist should be trapped into responding "yes" or "no." That question belongs entirely in the realm of theology, not of nature. It makes no sense unless you are in the realm of thought which makes room for supernatural things to exist, the realm of theology. For us, it is not a real question. Humanism moves on and leaves all that behind.

Are you an "unbeliever"? A "non-theist"? These terms are meaningful to theologians. But Humanists discuss their stance and perceptions in the language of science, not of theology. Humanism is not defined as mere denial of what theologians assert. It stands apart from theology on the firm ground of experience within nature. Why talk about other people's fantasies? Humanity and human experience are real and natural. These are what matter to humanists.

--Freethought Forum
Humanist Fellowship of San Diego