The last newsletter was great but I must disagree with the antihumanist column. What purpose does it serve? Our newsletter should inform its readers of the positive aspects of humanism, not as a review of those who think we are a threat to society. Let's not give them a platform. You say there is more to come--I hope not. I sincerely believe it's counterproductive.

--Rolf Kay

Thank you, Rolf, for your thoughtful response.

My purpose in addressing the origins and activities of the 'antihumanists' is not to act as their advocate. They certainly have the media outlets and funding to promote their own causes. My purpose was to inform the chapter of the results of my studies into the actions of a small group of conservative Christian activists who attack humanism but are not representative of Christians or the American public at large. I feel strongly that this information should be shared.

The accusations of the 'antihumanists' are often left unanswered. I hope that situation will not continue.

I know, Rolf, that your view on what our response should be is shared by many others. I would be happy to print the various opinions of chapter members and others as to how humanists should respond to criticism.

--Richard Garrard

Please send "Letters to the Editor" to Richard Garrard, P.O. Box 900212, Sandy, Utah 84090-0212 or via email.